Antitrust

• Oracle Corp. v. CedarCrestone — Represented Oracle with respect to antitrust counterclaims in IP dispute; dismissed
• In re High-Technology Employee Antitrust Litigation — Representing defendant in putative nationwide class action relating to alleged recruiting practices
• Representing premium consumer goods manufacturers in establishing North American and worldwide distribution system
• Yardi Systems v. RealPage — Represented Yardi with respect to antitrust counterclaims in IP dispute
• In re Intel Corporation Microprocessor Antitrust Litigation — Representing Intel in putative nationwide and California class actions under various state and federal antitrust laws
• State of New York v. Intel Corp. — Represented Intel in action brought on behalf of New York public and private entities under New York and federal antitrust laws
• Oliver v. Panasonic, et al. — Representing defendant in putative nationwide consumer class action challenging standards and licensing practices
• Represented client in FTC investigation of vertical price restraints; investigation closed
• In re Flash Memory Antitrust Litigation — Represented defendant in putative direct and indirect purchaser class actions; see 2010 U.S. Dist. Lexis 59491 (N.D. Cal.)
• Represented client in multijurisdictional price-fixing investigation in freight forwarding industry
• In re Walk-Ons Antitrust Litigation —Represented NCAA in Sherman Act case; see 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28824 (W.D. Wash.)

Appellate

• Masters v. Boston Scientific — Judgment following bench trial reversed and judgment rendered for client in stock options dispute (9th Cir. 2010)
• Tamraz v. Lincoln Elec. Co. et al. — Obtained JMOL in products liability case following a $20.5 million jury verdict (S.D. Ohio 2008)
• Peters v. General Motors Corp. — Appeal from $82 million judgment in products case; reversed, 200 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. App. 2006) (en banc)
• Myles v. General Motors Corp. — Appeal from $5.4 million judgment in products case; reversed, 905 So.2d 535 (Miss. 2005)
• Jernigan v. General Motors Corp. — Appeal from $82 million judgment in products case; reversed, 883 So.2d 646 (Ala. 2003)
• Covad Communications Corp. v. BellSouth — Appeal from dismissal of monopolization claims; reversed, 299 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2002)
• Bachman v. General Motors Corp. — Opposition to appeal from defense verdict in products case; affirmed, 776 N.E.2d 262 (Ill. App. 2002)
• Tanaka v. Univ. of Southern California — Opposition to appeal from dismissal of antitrust case; affirmed, 252 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2001)
• Harper v. General Motors Corp. — Appeal from $48 million judgment in products case; reversed, 61 S.W.3d 118 (Tex. App. 2001)
• Vinci v. Waste Management Corp. — Opposition to appeal from dismissal of antitrust case; affirmed, 80 F.3d 1372 (9th Cir. 1996); 36 Cal. App. 4th 1811 (1996)