Alert > Environmental and Natural Resources
EPA Declares Entire L.A. River Basin to Be a Navigable Water
On July 7, 2010, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson designated all of the Los Angeles River a “Traditional Navigable Water,” strengthening environmental regulation not only for the river, but also for the tributary streams and wetlands that comprise the Los Angeles River watershed. EPA’s designation supersedes a prior determination by the Army Corps of Engineers that less than four miles of the 51-mile, mostly cement-lined river were navigable, which could have cleared the way for developers and industry. Now, however, developers and businesses that operate along the river, as well as those that impact water in the 834 square miles of the river’s watershed, will have to consider the implications of compliance with the Clean Water Act (“CWA”).
Navigable Waters of the United States
Congress enacted the CWA “to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.” 33 U.S.C. § 1251(a). To achieve this goal, the CWA prohibits the discharge of any pollutants, including dredged or fill material, into “navigable waters,” except in compliance with the CWA. 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1362(12)(A). The CWA defines the “discharge of a pollutant” as “any addition of any pollutant to navigable waters from any point source.” 33 U.S.C. § 1362(12)(A). Two exceptions to the CWA’s pollutant discharge prohibition are: (1) the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit program under Section 402 of the CWA; and (2) the “dredge and fill” permit program pursuant to Section 404 of the CWA. These programs are triggered by a determination from the EPA that the body of water is “navigable.” 33 U.S.C. § 1362(12). Thus, the determination is a jurisdictional threshold. In comparison, California’s Porter-Cologne Act authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to regulate “all waters of the state,” which is defined as “any surface water or groundwater, including saline waters, within the boundaries of the state.” Cal. Water Code § 13050(e).
Under the CWA, “navigable water of the United States” includes the following: (1) water that is presently used, or has been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce; (2) all interstate waters including interstate wetlands; (3) all other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), and wetlands, the use, degradation, or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes, or which are used or could be used for industrial purpose by industries in interstate commerce; (4) all impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under the definition; (5) tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (1) through (4); (6) the territorial seas; and (7) wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (1) through (6). 33 C.F.R. §§ 328.3(a)(1), 329.4. EPA based its designation of the Los Angeles River on several factors, including the current and historical navigation of the river by watercraft, the current recreational and commercial uses of the river, public access, susceptibility to restoration, and the presence of ongoing restoration and educational projects.
Impact of EPA’S Determination on Dischargers and Developers
Now that the EPA has designated the Los Angeles River as a “traditional navigable water,” it is up to the state of California to determine if the river qualifies as an “impaired water” according to Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. If the state makes this determination, it will then have to establish Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) for all pollutants that are found in unacceptably high concentrations. This means that the total daily maximum discharge amount for each pollutant will need to be allocated among all those discharging into the river.
Furthermore, point source discharges into the river will be required to obtain an NPDES permit pursuant to Section 402 of the CWA. The cost of these permits and the amount of time that it takes to get a permit approved vary depending on nature of the discharger and the daily volume of discharge.
Also, according to the EPA’s “Rapanos guidance documents,” the designation of the Los Angeles River as a “traditional navigable water” makes the river, the tributary streams, and the wetlands adjacent to it (including any adjacent wetlands that do not maintain a continuous surface connection with the river) subject to CWA Section 404 permitting. According to the guidance documents, any relatively permanent non-navigable tributaries of the river and any wetlands that maintain a continuous surface connection with such tributaries are also subject to Section 404, which regulates the issuance of permits for the discharge of dredged or fill material.
Although Ms. Jackson believes that “[a] clean, vibrant LA River system can help revitalize struggling communities, promoting growth and jobs for residents of Los Angeles,” the consequences of EPA’s designation remain to be seen, especially given the potentially far-reaching impact of the designation on developers and businesses.
For more information on this alert, please contact:
Rick Rothman, Partner
rick.rothman@bingham.com, 213.680.6590
Jill Teraoka, Partner
jill.teraoka@bingham.com, 213.680.6422
Circular 230 Disclosure: Internal Revenue Service regulations provide that, for the purpose of avoiding certain penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, taxpayers may rely only on opinions of counsel that meet specific requirements set forth in the regulations, including a requirement that such opinions contain extensive factual and legal discussion and analysis. Any tax advice that may be contained herein does not constitute an opinion that meets the requirements of the regulations. Any such tax advice therefore cannot be used, and was not intended or written to be used, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties that the Internal Revenue Service may attempt to impose.
© 2010 Bingham McCutchen LLP One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110-1726 ATTORNEY ADVERTISING
To communicate with us regarding protection of your personal information or to subscribe or unsubscribe to some or all of Bingham McCutchen LLP’s electronic and mail communications, notify our privacy administrator at privacyUS@bingham.com or privacyUK@bingham.com (privacy policy available at www.bingham.com/privacy.aspx). We can be reached by mail (ATT: Privacy Administrator) in the US at One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110-1726 or at 41 Lothbury, London EC2R 7HF, UK, or at 866.749.3064 (US) or +08 (08) 234.4626 (international).
Bingham McCutchen (London) LLP, a Massachusetts limited liability partnership regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (registered number: 00328388), is the legal entity which operates in the UK as Bingham. A list of the names of its partners and their qualifications is open for inspection at the address above. All partners of Bingham McCutchen (London) LLP are either solicitors or registered foreign lawyers.
Bingham McCutchen LLP, a Massachusetts limited liability partnership, is the legal entity which operates in Hong Kong as Bingham McCutchen LLP. A list of the names of its partners practicing in the Hong Kong office and their qualifications is open for inspection at the address above. Bingham McCutchen LLP is registered with the Hong Kong Law Society as a Foreign Law Firm and does not practice Hong Kong law. Bingham McCutchen LLP operates in Hong Kong in formal association with Roome Puhar, a Hong Kong partnership which does advise on Hong Kong law.
This communication is being circulated to Bingham McCutchen LLP’s clients and friends. It is not intended to provide legal advice addressed to a particular situation. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.